Bid and sales proposals need almost the same set of slides for each kind of job. Why forcing content into bought templates is frustrating, and what picking the structure first looks like instead.
When a new bid notice comes out, you open last time’s proposal. The company introduction stays, while the understanding of the project and the execution plan are new. But which slides you need and which you can drop is a question you answer from scratch each time. Copy slides from the old file and the fonts and colors get mixed. Build new ones and you are aligning everything again from zero.
What you need is not more templates. It is the order: decide the message first, then pick the parts that fit it.
So many people buy templates. But templates come with their own complaint. On r/consulting, the top-voted reply under a post about buying templates (2024-10) says: "they make you think 'this visualisation is available so I will fit my data into it' instead of 'i have this message and I should present it that way'" The point is that you end up bending your message to the shapes the template has. The same thread has the opposite view: treat a template as parts to pick from rather than a mold, and work goes faster. If both are right, what you need is an order where the message comes first and the parts come second.
The deck templates page in getdeck has a deck structure for each kind of job. Pick a bid proposal or a sales proposal and you see the order of slides that job usually needs. Each slide is a layout, so a slide that does not fit your content can be swapped for another layout or removed. You start from the structure and pick parts, instead of forcing content into a mold. Swap a theme onto the same structure and the mood of the whole deck changes. You can try structures and themes on this page without logging in.
It fits proposal writers who rethink the structure every time. It does not refresh a report whose numbers change every month. For that, a tool that connects to your data fits better.