An evidence-grade comparison for reading out an A/B experiment. The hypothesis takes the title slot, a meta strip carries the window, traffic split and primary metric, and the control and variant values stand left and right with their sample sizes while lift, probability of winning and expected loss stack inside the empty center gutter. Below a full-bleed rule sit the verdict badge, the next action and two guardrail rows.
🔗 Markdown URL
https://getdeck.co/api/md/comparison-experiment-readout--cobalt-grid.md?lang=en&key=YOUR_KEYFetching your key...
⚡ MCP install command
Client
claude mcp add --transport http getdeck https://getdeck.co/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer gd_..."
Fetching your key...
Paste this into your terminal to connect your local AI agent to getdeck.
Best for: Recurring experiment readouts for product and growth teams, decision forums that need the verdict and its evidence together, and any readout that has to survive the questions that follow.
Use: When reporting an A/B experiment and handing over a ship, kill or inconclusive verdict with its evidence. Sample sizes, window, probability of winning and guardrails all belong on the same slide so the readout survives Q&A.
Avoid: For persuasive stat duels use comparison-stat-face-off; for a before-and-after narrative on one population use comparison-before-after; for weighted subjective scoring use comparison-decision-matrix.
Based on the currently selected theme Cobalt Grid. Switching the theme in the sidebar updates this section too.
Not used in any deck template yet.