Market-timing argument that follows the problem statement. A 26% left gutter stands the pivot year up as a 140px hero figure; the 74% right side carries one shared time axis with three trend rows stacked under it. Each trend reads as five bars of differing height per tick, and the convergence point is shown by a single accent dashed rule running vertically through all three rows with a NOW badge. Zero cards, zero centered elements.
🔗 Markdown URL
https://getdeck.co/api/md/problem-why-now-shift--cobalt-grid.md?lang=en&key=YOUR_KEYFetching your key...
⚡ MCP install command
Client
claude mcp add --transport http getdeck https://getdeck.co/api/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer gd_..."
Fetching your key...
Paste this into your terminal to connect your local AI agent to getdeck.
Best for: The why-now slide in a fundraising deck, market-timing arguments, proving that regulation, falling unit cost and user-behaviour change landed in the same year, internal new-business approval
Use: When you must answer "this problem is old, so why is it solvable now". Three unrelated forces (regulation, falling technology cost, changing user behaviour) are proven to cross at the same point on one shared time axis. Sits directly after the problem slide.
Avoid: Use problem-root-cause to decompose why the problem exists, problem-benchmark-gap to measure the gap against the industry, and problem-cost-of-inaction to show cost escalating over time. If the goal is synchronising execution schedules, timeline-parallel-tracks fits. With one or two forces the time axis is overkill; past four the rows shrink and the trends stop being readable.
Based on the currently selected theme Cobalt Grid. Switching the theme in the sidebar updates this section too.
This layout has no style-editing points declared (structure and colors are fixed).
Not used in any deck template yet.