Pricing.

3 plans in columns, 6 features in rows full-width comparison table. Recommended plan accent highlight.

Single enterprise plan focused layout. Left plan card (price/CTA) + right feature checklist.

Free/Pro/Enterprise 3-tier freemium pricing plan. Central Pro plan highlighted with POPULAR badge.

3-tier pricing card layout. Central recommended plan highlighted.

ROI vs investment visualization. Investment amount → multiplier → return 3-column structure for value framing.

3 pricing tiers arranged without cards in a single left-aligned vertical list (rows + dividers). Recommended tier highlighted by font size/color contrast.

Base fee + usage-based pricing slide. Left: base fee card; right: 3 per-metric rate cards; bottom: sample calculation bar.

Base plan + à la carte add-on modules. Left: checklist-style module list; right: receipt-style total panel.

Itemized value stack pricing slide: lists individual market value per included item, sums to a total value, then contrasts against a much lower actual offer price.

Pricing slide centered on a monthly/annual billing toggle switch, contrasting the total cost for each cycle and the annual savings amount as large numbers.

Asymmetric hero for products with exactly one plan. No card boxes: a 46% left side (plan badge, hero price, CTA, guarantee) and a 54% right side (inclusion checklist, what is excluded) separated by a single vertical rule.

A terms summary that lays out contract clauses rather than prices. Contract length, billing cycle, uptime commitment, support coverage, renewal and price escalation stack one per row as clause name / commitment / qualifier, with one line at the bottom stating what is still negotiable. No cards: a head rule and row dividers make it read like a contract schedule.

An outcome-based pricing slide: only results that pass a stated success test are billed, and everything that misses is shown as zero. A conclusion header, a hero unit price with a no-charge badge beside it and the human cost it replaces on the right, then a monthly settlement example whose bar splits billed from waived volume, plus the commitment terms. The charge trigger and the waiver sit on the same screen, which is the point of the layout.

A B2B price list that stands the growing discount into a four-step staircase as the commitment term or volume band goes up. A three-tier stack: a conclusion header, four bands each showing discount rate, riser and effective unit price, and the qualifying terms as a footnote. The riser height tracks the discount rate, so "commit longer and it gets cheaper" is proved by the picture rather than asserted.

A notice that tells existing customers their pricing is changing. The left 62% is a before-and-after table of three plans: current price, new price, change rate and what else changes, with only the new price column set large. The right 38% is an inverse panel with the existing-customer protection period as a breakout number and three dates leading to the change. How much, from when, and what it means for me read on one slide.